Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is a https://casinopokies777.com/royalvegas-casino/ lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of those two tales of violence took place in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some unsuspecting slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip websites that are streaming where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off steam, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either it was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here most of the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, that is one worker who keeps their own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a really peaceful man. He just moved in really calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd among these two tales is really a bit more frightening, because the axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the staff at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he don’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm in the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate utilizing the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of cash,’ therefore the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the neighborhood public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Is It Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst each and every of the 3 certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is related to the theory that neighboring communities would be affected by casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, is one of a handful of candidates whom have suggested that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that might be based in East Boston, for example.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it might have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley stated within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed advantages.’
In line with the state laws that produced the window of opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not to allow the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate settlement, with arbitration required in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t come to a resolution on their own.
Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t actually outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He might have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power on the whole vote. In other words, the casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the complete city in order to be approved.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
No matter if voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii as the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the sports book cookie jar after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading recreations betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large number of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the neighborhood roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling up with gambling shops and cash advance companies that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public places and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for the politician.
Spared for a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back in the corner for the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna claimed that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in respect utilizing the guidelines and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
And while Goulden is no longer head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a totally innocent contribution or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party may just be searching to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their neighborhood constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he certainly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ reported Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is thought to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year his workplace had been accused of editing their Wikipedia page to exhibit comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.